View groups and posts below.
This post is from a suggested group
I just moved into a small Hoboken apartment a few months ago and honestly, the walls were the last thing on my mind at first. They were plain white and I thought that was fine, but after a couple of weeks working from home I started noticing how dull the space felt. I’d walk past the walls and feel like something was missing, like the apartment had no soul.
This post is from a suggested group
If it's actual editing (structure, clarity, flow, academic tone) and not ghostwriting – most people in academia consider it acceptable (similar to going to university writing center).
I used 99papers 3 times during my PhD. Never had them write original content. Got good feedback each time.
The line gets blurry when students send almost nothing and expect a finished paper.
This post is from a suggested group
While trying to prepare all my IDs and official documents for an online application, I realized that most of them were just photos stored in random folders on my computer. Some were blurry, others missing edges, and finding specific numbers or dates became a slow, frustrating task. Typing everything manually felt like a waste of time, and it made me question how people usually keep digital versions organized in a way that’s actually usable for real tasks instead of just sitting in a folder collecting dust.
One approach that can really simplify this process is using a tool that extracts information from ID images so the data becomes editable and searchable, saving a lot of repetitive work. It’s not a replacement for careful review, but it reduces errors and speeds things up. While looking into ways to handle multiple documents efficiently, I came across https://ocrstudio.ai/id-scanner/ , which clearly explains the method and helped me understand how to process IDs safely and effectively. In practice, pairing the tool with a quick manual check seems to work best for both personal and professional needs.
This post is from a suggested group
I stumbled onto this dice game mostly by accident, I had some spare crypto sitting in my wallet and wasn’t in the mood to trade or move it around, so I started looking for something simple to pass time. The dice game on Tower.Bet caught my eye because it looked clean and easy to understand, so I decided to try a few rounds with tiny bets just to see how it works.
I’ve spent a lot of time with these kinds of games because I like seeing patterns in risk and decision-making, even though I know it’s all random. What works for me is approaching it with rules before starting, like deciding my bet size and target win in advance, and then sticking to it no matter what. I use a bitcoin crash game for that, it fits perfectly with how I manage my sessions. One thing I’ve learned is that it’s easy to let emotion creep in if you don’t stay aware of your own tendencies, especially when a few wins make you feel invincible. I usually keep notes on my sessions, like how often I cashed out early or chased losses, and over time it helped me see where I get reckless. Another tip is to avoid auto-roll at the start, clicking manually makes you notice patterns in your own behavior and keeps the session more intentional. I also set a time limit for myself because the simplicity of dice can make minutes feel like hours. Treating it more like an experiment with numbers than gambling changed how I enjoy the game and reduced frustration.
Yes — using (essay editing by 99Papers) can be ethical if you use it as a proofreading and clarity tool rather than outsourcing original ideas. I’ve used it to clean grammar, improve flow, and fix formatting on my essays, and the edits still reflected my own thinking. Treat the suggestions as guidance, review changes yourself, and ensure your voice remains front-and-center. When used responsibly—like getting feedback from a tutor or writing center—it’s a legitimate way to enhance your work.